His eyes were closed. Opened ours. Mothers and Grandmothers
The imposing emotional explosion produced as soon as he knew he had died
Néstor Kirchner acted as the crack awakening to a hypnotized. The haze induced by suggestion image fades and reality returns to its clear lead. Foam of days and the triviality of the media debate, behind which were visible interest, had thrown a distorting veil, which disappeared in a minute. Clarín
not even had time to lift the clear warning of a supermarket that was in his home on line for several minutes and cast a volley of fireworks on the news of the death of Kirchner, and involuntary celebration. The route of emotion been brought back to the lost rationality.
An ordinary man A few minutes later to settle the answer to the new situation: as the first day of the Kirchner government in 2003, just to take
Cristina in 2007 or like to know the results of election of 2009, heralded the condition for good governance was the consensus and agreement with corporate interests. This insistence on government's willingness to twist the insidious means, is an expression of powerlessness of those threats can not simply impose its own agenda, for lack of strength, cohesion and project. Kirchner had the sagacity persist in the plotted course undeterred by setbacks and risks.
That stubbornness in pursuing a clear objective over the inevitable contradictions of political action, simplicity of speech repeated unchanged for years and its practice is consistent with what the country recognized by demonstrations of love and gratitude not remembered for many decades, by the most diverse crowd of history, where labor unions agreed to sexual minorities. Only irreversible blindness of those who can not see this dialog confused with necrophilia deep in a changing society with the leadership that enabled him to emerge. A Within days, he began a wildly idealized. Who can fill the gap left by such a huge figure?, Is the sly subtext that, once again, points to undermine Cristina, recycling the fiction that he was the only real power. The best example is in the title of the chronicle of the Washington Post, "Transition South America: the two women who will lead the future of Brazil and Argentina." They both predicted "a difficult transition," as if
CFK newly take over the presidency, while the elected Dilma Rousseff. Kirchner was just an ordinary man, as in an extraordinary situation, lived up to the challenge. No more, nor less. The same goes for his wife. That's what the people held in Buenos Aires and Santa Cruz, with sad satisfaction.
Why change? were a sentimental and political groups, who shared life project. And the people never did better in decades. The economy is growing at over 9%, the debt / GDP ratio was reduced tenfold and was the lowest since the loan Baring, 1826, the reserves are the highest in history, relations with neighboring countries are close and cooperative United States and Europe, cordial and respectful but on an equal footing. The heads of the criminal dictatorship are imprisoned and are judged. Justice operates independently of government, although not always the powers that be. Production and agricultural exports and cars will be this year's largest in history. Consumption grows despite high inflation, formal wages exceed the CPI, the Universal Child compensates for the difference in the precarious, unemployment fell to 7.6% and falling. Workers at the Renault French multinational, which introduced a new car, with 40% of Argentine parts, hailed the president. Are as young as those who filled the Plaza de Mayo and Buenos Aires streets for Kirchner fire. Why should a policy change Cristina enjoys such membership? If she proposed it, today would be reelected in the first round, and biggest difference in 2007 when he turned to the second force.
Famous tension is gone and CFK Kirchner spent the last days on the summit of G-20. If the dominant story is true, this should be reflected in a climate of serenity and harmony. On the contrary, all the contradictions of Group Ahhh ... loomed as fractures. The most deleterious effects affected the Peornismo
opposition Civic Coalition Liberator, radicalism, socialism and the PRO, where there was a real implosion. A week before the Oct. 27, Joseph Scioli called projects and offered positions in the future presidential cabinet of his brother. His work with Francisco de Narváez
not due to having been distanced from the governor of Buenos Aires, as agreed simulate: Daniel Scioli aspire to the presidency and De Narvaez accompany him as a candidate in the main province of the country. In the last dialogue with Scioli, Kirchner cut road and invited him to compete with him in the primaries PJ. "If you gain me I support you," he said. Scioli protested but continued loyalty with its plan to rally the Kirchner and peornismo
dissident, without confronting anyone. The political space for this fantasy has been made tiny and has no better alternative than re-election in Buenos Aires. But this is inconvenient to
Peornismo opponent. Missing in action as well as Vice President Julio Cobos
(beneficiary of the greatest musical hit of the year), De Narvaez has renewed contacts with Senator Carlos Reutemann
, who hit a slam in the face of former senator
Eduardo Duhalde and his acolytes, who intended to continue as if nothing had happened. Kirchner Reutemann was negotiating with an agreement to stop in Santa Fe Covenant reimposed the Radical-Socialist. It involved the primary election between the deputy Kirchner Peronist
Agustín Rossi and stepson reutemista Jorge Obeid. For Kirchner, Cristina and now, the condition was that Senator soybean support the presidential candidacy of FPV. The budget vote was a litmus test for that amalgam: Rossi requested that the six deputies who respond to national and Obeid vote Reutemann official project, to which they refused. The confluence of July is only possible within an agreement by October. Otherwise, only solve the Reutemann problems, which is not a priority in Olivos. The same applies to Cordoba, where the talks are well underway with the former governor José De la Sota, less fussy than Reutemann. In the capital, contacts were established with partners closest to
Pino Solanas. In combination with CFK, Pino could even win the municipal leadership. The problem is that this would force him to leave your gift there, and also disperse his troops, a sum of microenterprises such as
Claudio Lozano, Humberto and Miguel Bonasso Tumini, always clinging to a national do-not fall skirt the map. Also moved the tectonic plates in the agricultural employers' associations, Liaison Committee which was forgotten because of the greed of
Eduardo Buzzi to relocate to the new situation. Until recently attempted to go to the government of Santa Fe by the Duhalde. Today the struggle for mere survival, discredited in all environments known to frequent, and he longs only to shoot a cable from the ship official. He was even mentioned by Clarín, unforgiving, among operators of FPV to approve the budget!
Implosion The biggest scandal was the head of the Civic Coalition Liberator, with his condemnation of a new Olivos Pact. The radicals had never renounced the constitutional reform of 1994, negotiated between their leader Raul Alfonsin and President Carlos Menem. However, the mere mention of
Elisa Carrio jumped as if it were the worst insult. It is true that were sensitized by the fracture itself that went into half in the race for the presidency of the bloc, which is now repeated in the Senate. Also the bed creaks macrista, as two-headed animal, exchanged accusations against each other. More quiet was the official response to another outburst of Carrie, about an alleged "Banelco de Cristina." Aníbal Fernández
resorted to psychological mechanism of projection and Rossi said the scandal of a complaint without foundation was the only way to prevent a defeat in the upcoming budget vote. The assistant confirmed the chameleon Carrio, Patricia Bullrich
, former Labor Minister Fernando de la Rua, to confess that "if there spoke up, we lost the vote." And declarations of the Members Cinthya Hotton (macrismo Gospel) and Elsa Alvarez (radicalism Patagonian) on telephone calls had been interpreted by the opposition press as offerings bribery, which none of them had said. It would be naive, if not perverse, to assume that such management is done by telephone and without a prior personal relationship. True Banelco was the transfer of 5 million pesos to pay their own and other senators from the clerk of the Senate, not a political dialogue on the importance of having a budget for the last year in office. The complaint is of such extreme gravity that is not understood how the two legislators failed their prosecution, required by Article 117 of the Criminal Procedure Code, or agreed to identify who or who were offered what. Instead, it encourages research parliament, which once again tarnish the government will seek, as they have since the day he was sworn Cristina. Ahhh ... The Group and left satellites not learned the lesson with the law pension of 82 percent. That one parliamentary success achieved in one year turned against them. When CFK his promise to veto was not a single protest of alleged affected, while in France more than three million people paralyzed the country to complain about the rise of three years in retirement age. It required an effort of volunteerism and microclimate to be unaware of the government's assessment that throbbed in the deep layers of society and surfaced in Kirchner's death was a glimpse of the danger of a reversal.
De Buenos Aires to Seoul "This president and few intelligent and feisty, brave as any" (as defined by the grandson of one of the great jurists of the liberal establishment, referred to as "the girl we like ") was there at the same time opening the table of Finance at the World Summit of G-20 in Korea. They claimed their active policies to overcome the financial crisis and sustain employment and consumption. Mentioned reserve accumulation as a defense against market volatility, the payment to them of external commitments fiscal resources to invest in the real economy and restrictions on speculative capital inflows. "The finances have to scale back production of goods and services and we have to improve wages because people must eat," he said. To dislike of those who do not abandon the disastrous recipes establishment, concluded that in Argentina, "found that no one sector can grow at the expense of the collapse of the rest of society" and that such instruction is applicable globally. It is not a presumptuous conclusion. In the Netherlands, economists Naastepad Servaas Storm and CWM, the Delft University of Technology, just published an article ("The cost of inequality ") which analyzes the consequences of the theory of unemployment non-accelerating inflation (or, by its acronym in English, the NAIRU), responsible for the dramatic imbalances that led to the collapse of 2007 / 2008. For the NAIRU, which the authors equate with the reserve army of unemployed of the doctrine of Marx, there would be equilibrium unemployment, resulting from distribution conflict between workers and employers. Its main implication is that governments and central bankers should not promote full employment because it would accelerate inflation. Consequently, the labor market should be deregulated, the welfare states put on a diet and position weakened bargaining power of unions, so as to reduce real wages on productivity and improve corporate profitability. Growth and equity would thus be incompatible. This familiar description of what happened in Argentina of neoliberalism is the basis of the global crisis. To accentuate the lower income inequality and 90 percent of the population came a captive market of loans to keep the living standards of these homes. At the same time increasing revenues 10 percent remaining superabundant source of liquidity that hedge funds deposited. This excess credit is not used to finance technical progress but also to create imaginative new financial instruments such as securitization of mortgages, at a certain point, were unsustainable and pricked the bubble. Although the crisis has emerged in the financial sector, say the Dutch, its roots are deeper and reside in the structural change in the distribution of income in the last thirty years. To prevent financial fragility and crisis requires "discipline the firms, investors and financial markets." The authors propose a shared decision-making at the enterprise level, to discourage speculative activity and not productive. "A more egalitarian growth, pulled by wages and low unemployment, is crucial to prevent accumulation of excess liquidity that triggered the current crisis. " The alternative to the NAIRU is the return to financial regulation and more equitable policies for full employment. As if he came back from a hypnotic sleep, Storm and set out some old Naastepad basic truths. "The salary is not only a cost to businesses (as is the NAIRU), but higher wages also produce macroeconomic benefits such as increased demand and increased productivity faster, higher capacity used by businesses and higher profits." If the demand and profits will also increase labor productivity and investment in new equipment technology. Higher wages, strong legal protection for workers and their effective participation in the management of companies also motivate workers to engage with companies through increased productivity. In addition to the leaders of a dozen global companies, they heard the message and vice president Cristina of the Industrial Union
, Hector Mendez and Jose Ignacio Mendiguren, the same who have led opposition to all government measures adopted in this regard and now resist, with the support of Catholic Bishops, worker participation in gains in the Constitution for 53 years. What minds have understood these obtuse, reluctant to raise inevitable?
Source: Hypnosis ended
